Evaluating the Bachelor of Dental Surgery Curriculum of Kathmandu University Using the CIPP Evaluation Model: A Mixed-Method Study

Introduction Evaluation, as a tool for ongoing quality enhancement, identifies the strengths and shortcomings of any program. So, this study aimed to evaluate the current curriculum of the Bachelor of Dental Surgery of Kathmandu University (BDS-KU) using the CIPP model. Materials and Methods This is a mixed-method study utilizing the qualitative component to assess the input and process, and quantitative component to assess the product of the current curriculum of the BDS-KU. Key informant interviews (KIIs, n=7) and in-depth interviews (IDIs, n=9) was used to evaluate the input and process component of the CIPP model among heads of departments and the faculty members. While the fifteen web-based survey questionnaires (n=78) were submitted to the graduates of this institution to explore the product component. Qualitative data were analyzed thematically, while quantitative data were presented as percentages and frequencies. Results Context evaluation: The objectives of the current curriculum are aligned with the current local and international needs in the field of dentistry. Input evaluation: Most of the heads of the departments were satisfied with the current input part of the curriculum. Process evaluation: The current curriculum undergoes revision at regular intervals but it has not been updated since its beginning. Product evaluation: Most of the graduates can practice evidence-based dentistry, communicate effectively with their patients, work in different health care settings, and easily clear the national and international licensing exams. Conclusions The CIPP evaluation model has proven effective in assessing the strengths and weaknesses of the BDS-KU regarding input, context, process, and product.