Assessment of environmental variables for species distribution modelling: insights from the mosaic distribution of red- and yellow-bellied toads
Abstract
Species distribution modelling can possibly be improved through the preferential use of explanatory variables that reflect the natural history features of the species being modelled. Red- and yellow-bellied toads (genusBombina) engage in an intricate mosaic distribution across Europe. Analysing new atlas data on these species’ mutual distribution in Hungary with principal coordinate analysis we identified their differential ecological preferences as forested, hilly and mountainous forB. variegataand open lowland forB. bombina. These locally operating parameters we consider to be good proxies for the essential species difference which resides in breeding in ephemeral puddles (B. variegata) versus larger permanent ponds (B. bombina). With two-species distribution modelling–in which the presence of one species is contrasted with the presence of the counterpart species–we obtained excellent model fit (AUC) for climate and elevation / land cover datasets alike (AUC=0.98 versus 0.95). For both models fit values dropped upon transference to surrounding countries, yet the latter model kept significantly higher predictive power (AUC=0.91) than the climate model (AUC=0.79). Swapping elevation for ‘hilliness’ as suggested in the literature had a significant negative effect on model performance. We conclude that an informed parameter selection enhances model transferability, therewith improving our understanding of species-habitat associations.
Graphical abstract
<fig id="ufig1" position="float" fig-type="figure" orientation="portrait"><graphic xmlns:xlink="http://www.w3.org/1999/xlink" xlink:href="650429v1_ufig1" position="float" orientation="portrait"/></fig>Highlights
Red- and yellow-bellied toads engage in a yin-yang-like mosaic distribution across Europe.
Species’ differential habitat characteristics were studied with principal coordinates.
Species distribution modelling was with climate data and with landscape variables.
Models produced with atlas data for Hungary were assessed over neighbouring countries.
Transferred models with elevation and forestation performed better than climate-based ones.
Related articles
Related articles are currently not available for this article.